Teaching, AI, ATTP,TU Vienna, Architecture Theory The Rome/Fortune seminar aims to connect
the idea of asarotos oikos (the unswept house, das ungefegte Haus)—a
visual motif depicting a mosaic floor scattered with the remnants of a lavish
banquet—to the concepts of the given and the existing (Bestand).
By inhabiting the unswept floor of Hadrian’s Villa
in Rome, we establish a way of thinking that learns through accumulation,
leftovers, and what resists cleaning up. At once intimate and excessive, the
image frames domestic comfort as abundance, disorder, and residue.
Among bones, shells, peels, and nuts, this figure
complements the idea of learning as home, introduced by Vitruvius in his
reflections on domestic architecture. For Vitruvius, the fulcrum of
architecture lies in the abundance of learning: a capacity that transcends
geography, social ties, and the instability of fortune (fortuna),
granting the learned individual a form of global citizenship.
Tasked with the extreme allowances produced by the
amplitude of computational and built Bestand, the seminar turns toward
the curious nature of foundations. We look at the floor and resist the desire
to clean the unswept. Rather, we negotiate its principality; rather, we think
in terms of affordances. How might we observe and speculate, bridge noise with
measure, see perspective through the oblique, compute the primary through the
provisional?
Drawing on Michel Serres’ Foundations trilogy—Rome,Statues, Geometry—the course moves between human and machine,
tracing relations within what is already present. Through the writings of
Vitruvius, Michel Serres, Massimo Scollari, Erwin Panofsky, Pierre Hadot,
Manfredo Tafuri, Ernst Cassirer, and Raymond Ruyer, the seminar sways between
Rome and Fortune to think the spatial through the soft.
Everybody talks about Chance: An architectonic arrival with Arakawa+Gins2025
‘If
the poet … must perforce dramatize the oneness of the experience, even though
paying tribute to its diversity, then his use of paradox and ambiguity is seen
as necessary.’ – Cleanth Brooks in Venturi’s Complexity and Contradiction
‘An
eternal object realized in respect to its pure potentiality as related to
determinate logical subjects is termed a 'propositional feeling' in the
mentality of the actual occasion in question.’ – Alfred North Whitehead in Process and Reality
How
do we go about architecture when Everybody talks about Chance?
AI,
probability, and stochastics actively shape our Zeitgeist and add new
vocabulary to our architectural atlas. A few years ago, the publication Everybody
talks about the Weather (2023) addressed another public issue, the
climate crisis, with a call to study the climate through art and science. The
seminar wants to emulate this coping mechanism to make architecture as a
process that is simultaneously natural and artificial, as chance and the
weather.
In
the Chance seminar, we will explore the weather as
a metaphor – through clouds, storms, air, lightings, pollution, flooding, kairos,
the weatherman – to talk about chance as mutation, ambiguity, contradiction and
pattern.
A
pattern, however, is not a habit. Habits are elements of organization,
prediction, framing and comfort in daily life. For the artist Shusaku Arakawa
and the poet Madeline Gins, an artist collaboration which began in 70s New
York, habits are highly suspicious. In their work - Bioscleave House (2008),Container of Perceiving (1984), Site of Reversible Destiny (1995),The mechanism of meaning (1968-1988) - they favor an art of space-making
that is shaped by mutable habits.
The
work of Arakawa+Gins will guide our first explorations and incentivize our
focus around points of inflection and changes in direction. We will talk about
eternity and destiny when designing within probabilistic setups as a gesture
that overcomes the platitude of total randomness, or the comfort of habit.
From
the ‘moving pictures of thought’ that Charles Peirce sees in diagrams, or the
‘strange loops’ of Douglas Hofstadter we will see how the
enactment of habits turns into patterns of creation. We will continue with
books that look at chance, the weather, ambiguity, contradiction, and
metamorphose them into manners, process, magic and ideas to arrive at
Architecture.
https://www.uibk.ac.at/de/architekturtheorie-baugeschichte/architekturtheorie/events/the-architecture-chat/The Architecture Chat is the new lecture series of the Institute of Architectural Theory introduced in the summer semester 2024, dedicated to providing space for discussions about the relation of architecture with philosophy and science. It was conceived, designed and organized by Maya Christodoulaki and moderated by Maya Christodoulaki, Tim Altenhof and Miro Roman.
Communication in architecture is nothing new: a forum, a dialogue, a platform – there are countless formats which allow us to talk to each other. Yet, the Chat has charmed the world as an art of discovery, as for over a year now it transcends its sonorous articulations by reading, thinking and writing computationally through LLMs with us and for us. At this turning point, the Architecture Chat aims to facilitate new concepts and approaches to thinking about architecture, seeking creative ways to bridge intellectual traditions with new narratives in the face of prescient political and natural realities.
This spring we welcome six guests: Stephan Trüby (Uni Stuttgart), Philippe Morel (The Bartlett), Vera Bühlmann (TU Wien), Tülay Atak (Die Angewandte), Jörg Gleiter (TU Berlin) and Andrew Witt (Harvard GSD) in our faculty to listen to and discuss their recent publications. With the Architecture Chat we hope to touch upon current issues in our discipline, exploring boundaries and formats, discussing rhetoric and formulations, and probing what fascinates us and what might go out of fashion.
There is chatting and rumbling, murmur, and noise - Machine Learning is about dealing with signals that are muddy and unclear in which we look for harmony and sense.
In this seminar at TU Wien, we will explore ways to work conceptually as a space-maker with the idea of CHANCE. With Large Language Models, an architect’s operation has shifted from designing to architecting, as an act of navigation with and among the myriad nodes and connections that make up the art of space-making.
We set the center of this architecting operation in the kitchen, where CHANCE manifests through a creator/inventor/thinker that improvises with Midjourney, ChatGBT and AskAlice all possible text-to-text, text-to-image and image-to-text productions. In the kitchen we find our tools: we learn to improvise using Machine Learning Models (convolution, GAN, stable diffusion) and use them as storytelling devices. On the kitchen table, we play a game of associations from speech-to-image (DIXIT) to experiment with the backbone of every narration, biographies. Here, we open a communication channel with non-other than (our own) Leon Battista Alberti. He is perhaps best known for his seminal work Ten Books on Architecture (1452), or his treatises On Painting (1435), and On Sculpture (1464). Yet in this seminar, we focus on Alberti’s antiquarianism, art of discovery and autobiographical motif found in his letters, short stories and mythical novels.
With these tools at hand, this seminar examines an architectural hypothesis, suggesting that the probabilistic, self-referential nature of Machine Learning aligns with concepts inherent in architecture and the art of space-making.